Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 02:28

Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Scientists capture slow-motion earthquake in action - Phys.org
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
ChatGPT Is Making Us Weird - Business Insider
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
4 everyday habits that help prevent heart attacks - Times of India
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Neuroscientists just discovered a fascinating fact about the grooves in your brain - PsyPost
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
This T-Mobile free phone offer may be its hottest deal yet - TheStreet
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What do flat Earthers think causes the "magical downward force"?